What "advertising" actually covers
Most practices assume advertising means paid ads and a homepage. The AHPRA advertising guidelines 2025 definition is far broader — and that gap is where most complaints originate.
Under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, advertising is any communication — paid or unpaid — that promotes a regulated health service. That covers your website, Google Business Profile, social media, email newsletters, and directory listings. The test: could this content influence someone's decision to use a regulated health service? If yes, it's advertising.
AHPRA obligations apply to practitioners, practice owners, and anyone acting on their behalf — including marketing agencies. If an agency posts non-compliant content for you, the practitioner is still responsible.
What changed in the recent guideline updates
AHPRA revised its advertising guidelines across 2023–2024. Several changes closed genuine grey areas; a few created new obligations most practices haven't yet acted on.
Testimonials: scope got wider
A testimonial now covers any statement — from a patient or someone reasonably interpreted as one — about clinical outcomes or personal experience. Outcome-focused Google reviews must be flagged for removal; you cannot embed or leave them up. Patient comments on social posts referencing clinical results are testimonials too — leaving them up is treated as using them. Case studies that identify a patient and discuss their outcome are also in scope.
- "Sarah came in with chronic migraines and now she's symptom-free."
- Embedding a Google review that mentions a clinical result
- Before/after photos — even with written patient consent
- Reviews about service experience with no clinical claims ("Friendly staff, easy to book")
- Linking to your Google profile without highlighting specific testimonials
- Educational content on conditions and treatments — without patient stories
Social media and misleading claims
You are responsible for all content on accounts you run — including unprompted patient comments. Enable comment moderation or build a regular review step. On misleading claims: phrases like "most effective treatment," "drug-free pain relief," or "our approach gets results" cross the line without substantiation, even when technically true in some cases.
AI-generated content and the compliance gap
The AHPRA advertising guidelines now explicitly address AI content: same obligations as anything written by a human, and "I didn't check it closely" is not a defence. Generic AI tools are not trained on AHPRA compliance — they routinely produce outcome claims dressed as education, comparative language without evidence, and pseudo-testimonial phrasing. The risk is highest because polished output gets published without a review step.
Make compliance review a mandatory step in any AI-assisted content workflow. Poor grammar signals a draft; authoritative-sounding AI copy often goes straight to publish.
The 3 biggest traps practices fall into
Trap 1: The "educational" blog post that isn't
Blog posts on practice websites are advertising. The line is between describing a condition and claiming what your treatment does to it. You can explain plantar fasciitis and available treatment types. You cannot write "Our podiatrists treat plantar fasciitis, with most patients reporting significant pain reduction after three sessions." That's an outcome claim — the blog format doesn't change it.
Trap 2: The Google Business Profile left untouched
Patients write outcome-focused reviews. Other users populate the Q&A section. The description you wrote three years ago may now contain comparative language that breaches current rules. Left unreviewed, a Google Business Profile is often a practice's highest-risk advertising asset.
Trap 3: Before/after content from a photographer or social manager
Before/after images are explicitly prohibited for regulated health services — regardless of consent, editing, or channel. Photographers and content managers don't carry AHPRA obligations. You do. If this content is live anywhere, take it down.
Compliance checklist for existing marketing
Work through this against your current assets — it surfaces the most common issues fast.
- Website: Outcome claims or success rates on any page? Patient reviews quoted or embedded? Comparative language? Before/after images?
- Google Business Profile: Outcome claims in the description? Reviews with clinical statements? Patient-generated Q&A answers about results?
- Social media: Before/after posts still live? Outcome claims in captions or comments? Recovery narratives in reels?
- Other: Email campaigns referencing patient outcomes? Directory listings reviewed? AI content published without a compliance check?
Remove non-compliant content promptly. Voluntary removal before a complaint is lodged is treated more favourably than removal after a compliance notice.
How to stay visible without crossing the line
The AHPRA advertising guidelines restrict specific types of claims — they do not prohibit marketing your practice. Write condition-focused content that explains conditions and outlines treatment approaches. It's compliant, genuinely useful, and strong in search (patients search symptoms, not practitioners). Stop before you claim what will happen when they see you. For practices specialising in female health conditions, our guide to women's health marketing covers how to build authority within these rules.
For experience content: "A 45-minute initial assessment where we discuss your history" is compliant. "You'll leave pain-free" is not. Clinic photos, team introductions, and booking explainers build trust without touching outcome territory.
Schedule a formal compliance review — website, social, GBP, email — every 12 months. After any significant guideline update, check the affected areas specifically. Don't wait for a complaint to tell you something's wrong.
Need a compliance check on your marketing?
We audit practice websites, Google profiles, and social content against current AHPRA guidelines — and tell you exactly what needs to change.
Claim your free audit →